Tuesday, June 21, 2011

RARE BASED ISU FROM THE ZEF SIDE OF JAPAN

Alright, it's time for the crappy crap crap ISU that I do a 3:00 AM 5 hours before the exam because I was spending my time being silly.

It's hard to believe that only 20 years ago people we're still carrying around Cassette and CD players. Which makes it almost impossible to believe that there was actually a time when music was just there for us to download, or even listen to. The way we gather and listen to the music we love has progressed so far over the last hundred years that's it makes one wonder just how further it will go. Music consumes so much of our lives, but maybe we take it for granted. Hundreds of years ago people couldn't just go and download their artist's new song, they would have to go and listen to them play live. How we hear and get our music is an always expanding aspect of society.

The Phonautograph:

The phonautograph was the first device that made it possible to record sound. Invented in 1877 by Edouard-Leon Scott de Martinville, it was able to record sound, but not play the audio back. It wasn't until 1877 that a man named Charles Cros came up with an idea to play back the audio recorded from the phonautograph, similar to the way music is recorded onto a record. However before Cros could create his invention, Thomas Edison introduced the phonograph, a device that could both record and reproduce sound.


One of the first ever recordings of sound. Recorded on the phonautograp (which is the picture in the video), playback was achievable in 2008 using modern computer technology.

The Phonograph:

Invented by Thomas Edison in 1877, the phonograph revolutionized the way sound was recorded. Being able to both record and playback sound, the invention made Edison an international celebrity. The device worked by speaking into the device as a small needle etched the sound into a rotating cylinder made of tinfoil. The playback was achieved by the needle again going across the etched path which made a vibration, reproducing the sound waves. The phonograph was improved in 1870 by Alexander Graham Bell and his associates by replacing the tinfoil cylinder with wax coated cardboard cylinders.


A demonstartion of how the Edison Cylinder Phonograph works.

The Gramophone:

A variation of Edison's phonograph, the gramophone became the most used device for music and sound for almost all of the 20th century. Patented by Emile Berliner in 1887, it differed from Edison's phonograph because it recorded laterally instead of rotating on a flat disc instead of a large cylinder. Although the disks were not necessarily better at delivering audio, the were much easier to produce, store, and label. Because of this, the mass production of gramophone record players and records began in 1892. Gramophone records became the dominant device for listening to audio, and gave way into the records seen today like the 78 rpm and the 45 rpm. The record palyer as it is commonly known is still around today, even after being beaten out by the cassette tape and compact disc.

Records and record players have recently seen an increase of sales. Now electronic, they can be hooked up to a computer and many other things. Many audophiles argue that the audio quality of a record is better then the standard quality of music sold on CDs and purchased on the internet.

Magnetic Tape Recording:

The magnetic tape recording revolutionized sound recording. The idea began as early as 1877 and first saw invention in the late 1920's. Ludwig Blattner Picture Corporation modified a wire recording device (similar to the tape recorder, but used thin wire) and used thin steel tape instead of wire. The Germans further developed the technology into the first practical tape recorders. The recorders work by turning sound into passing magnetic currents between a recording head and a passing by magnetic medium which is magnetized according to the head. The playback then picks up these magnetic changes on the medium and converts them into sound. The main advantage of magnetic tape recording was the high-fidelity (quality) of the sound that was produced. It was unlike nothing that had ever been heard before, which made it immensely popular. Sound could also be erased and rerecorded over again and again. The recording process was much simpler than with records and could be easily duplicated from tape to tape. The size was much smaller and was less fragile than a record. Cassette decks became the primary source of getting music for people from the 1970s to mid-1990s. Cassette's greatly influenced the bootlegging music (music which is not publicly released by the performer). The small size of recording devices and ease of tape to tape sound transfers aloud anyone to record and create copies of it with ease.


Compact Disk:


The compact disc is the first music recording and playback device which stored the audio as digital data. Created by Sony, the disc is read by an optically by a laser. Rather than made for the use of recording, it's primary use was for the playback of music, and later on the storage of other digital data. The optical disk soon became a major market for video games as well, with the Sony Playstation using them to play games. The CD allowed users to have it interact with other new technology. A CD's contents could be copied to other CDs and onto a home computer. CDs began to grow in popularity in the mid 80's and still continue strong today. Most music stores began carrying only CDs and still do. The compact disc laid the ground work for the digital music revolution that was soon to follow.

Digital Music:

Digital music has completely changed the music industry. Almost anything can be dont with the clock of a mouse now. The process of creating analog audio into digital is by converting a sound into a string of binary code which is read by a computer and placed on hard drive or storage device. Digital music could be compressed into extremely small amounts of data to be able to hold as much as possible, but this results in a loss of quality to the sound. The most common format of digital audio in MP3, which has the highest compression rate and is used as the consumer standard for digital music. However many people dislike MP3 files, stating that there is a loss of quality. Other less common digital audio formats such as FLAC and Ogg have much better quality tha MP3s, but also require a m uch larger amount of data. Digital Audio player, a device that could store MP3 and other common audio formats in large amounts became increasingly popular in the mid-2000s. The introduction of P2P file sharing websites on the internet caused a great hole in the music and recording industry. P2P file sharing sites allowed users to upload and allow others to download it in unlimited quantities for free. Known and "pirating" it became an increasingly large problem and is still continuing today.

Now it's time for me wot weigh in. Just what do I think about all this razz matazz? Well shut up and I'll tell you. Music has most definitely come a long way from its origins, and I can confidently say I don't know what I'd if I couldn't carry my music around with me. Music is always with us now, but that isn't necessarily a good thing. Technology has allowed us to listen to music all the time now, no matter where we are or what we're doing. However I do think that this kind of disconnects us from the music itself. Hardly anyone anymore just sits down and listens to a record. We're not excited to go get that new album at the store, because we can just download it for free off the internet. Before the introduction of digital music and CDs and tapes, music was something that you either had to sit down and listen to or not. It's become more of company to other tasks rather than a task itself. But at the same time more people can experience it, more people than ever are listening to music because of how much easier it is to access. We can gather music from anywhere in the world now, there is so much of it out there on the internet just waiting for someone to find it. People from all over the globe can share their music with each other thanks to digital audio. I think that although with the advances in music there have come some disadvantages, true fans of music will always cherish it for more than just something to listen to while you're walking the dog.
"That's what music is: entertainment. The more you put yourself into it, the more of you comes out in it." - Kurt Cobain

I know I know, I didn't talk about radio or stereo, but I'm just too lazy. I justify it by saying that I am only speaking about the access of recording and playing music from a personal in-you-room kind of way. So yeah, sue me.


Sunday, June 19, 2011

RARE BASED MINI REVIEWS FOR THE ZEF SIDE OF JAPAN

We've been through so much this semester, well for me it's been about half a semester. I've seen some things I liked, and some things I didn't like (namely the teacher). It's time I told everyone how I really feel instead of keeping everything bottled inside like I usually do (HAHAHA). On with the reviews.

DO YOU LIKE PARTIES? MINI REVIEW NUMERO ICHI

The Beastie Boys laid the playing field for the entire rap genre. They were always fightin' for their right to party, as they explained in their famous 1986 music video "Fight For Your Right (To Party)." This is a splendid music video, it really captures the quirkiness of the Beastie Boys and contains many themes that we still see today in the hip hop genre such as scandalous parties, drinking, and smokin' hot women. The Boys come bustin' in the door and show those nerds how things should be done. They are everything that white suburban kids wish they could be. That's probably why the song became so popular, everyone wants to party, and when you can't, you do the next best thing : listen to someone who can. The Beastie Boys showed us that rap isn't just for black kids living in the Bronx, it's for everyone from everywhere. We're all just jealous of the Beastie Boys.


TEACHINGS OF A TEACHER. MINI REVIEW NUMERO NI
Kate Hillier Edwards
Mr. Scott Edwards. Lover, Hater, Teacher, Father. All in one nice bearded package. I am going to review your teaching for this semester. Overall I would give it an 88%, just shy of that DESERVED 90. As usual, you can grab the attention of the students, however it takes longer than it should. You gotta pound that hammer down son, get up in their grills. The majority of problems I found this semester were all based around staying on topic, we (and I'm not including myself) could never stick to the lesson plan. I understand that this is a loosely based class, but please try harder to keep your next batch of idiots (again, not including myself) in line. I suggest given them 10 minutes of "free talk" time at the end of the period, however in exchange any interruptions will not be tolerated. I also noticed that during 2001 you answered your cell phone? This is unacceptable. So it does not distract you I recommend leaving it at home. You're a good teacher, stop letting students push you around. You don't have to be nice to everybody. I am hoping this newborn offspring of yours will bring out a more strict side.

TO MONO OR NOT TO MONO? THAT IS THE QUESTION. THE BEATLES IN MONO MINI REVIEW NUMERO SAN.
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41AdKUJqIFL._SL500_AA300_.jpg
Remember this conversation? Cause I do. Now I'm not hear to rag on mono, I'm here to tell the truth. Mono and Stereo recordings do not make a difference! I don't care what the original one was record in, or how many small snippets of extras are in it, it's all the same thing. The worst part is it makes these hipsters run wild thinking their so chic and interesting cause they have the Bob Dylan mono box set where the CDs are made to resemble the original vinyl releases. All Dylan does is play guitar and ramble, how is spending more for something justified in being able to here him play an extra chord or something? The Bealtes mono box set is like 400 dollars at Sunrise, whereas the stereo box set (which looks much nicer) is a mere 200. Ghareck downloaded the entire Beatles discography in mono, and he said he couldn't here a single difference. If you bought the mono first, that's cool. But don't buy it if you already have the stereo recording. Ghareck is getting the Bob Dylan mono set of 8 CDs, four of which he already has. But because they're in stereo they "aren't the same." YES THEY ARE.

UH OH. NO COWBELL IN A PART OF THE VERSE?!?! WHATEVER WILL I DO WITHOUT THE COWBELL. I mean come on, it's not like it will hinder your listening experience, just your wallet. The only people who buy both only do it so they can talk about how they know more than other people. I'm too angry too continue this review so I will end it here.
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ldjgd4IEQS1qfaer9o1_500.jpg

WOAH - MINI REVIEW NUMERO SHI

We did watch this in class. You put it on the thing and everything, so it counts. Anyways, this has everything you want. It's like the best action movie packed into 4 minutes. You have a muscly guy screaming, a building being blown up, and a killer soundtrack. WOAH and OH rhyme, so they make song. I don't know why, but you can never get tired of those words. Everything in the video just flows together so perfectly you'd think it was just naturally this way. The song the exert is taken from is actaually 12 minutes long, and really sucks. But that 30 seconds of woahing makes up for the rest of the eleven and a half minutes of crap. The video is the most masculine thing every created. It screams "WOAH" right in your face, and you just sit there groooooving on it.

Well that's it for my mini-reviews. I wanted to review Darren, Jake and Rileys silent film cause it was awesome, but it wasn't on the BCI media studies youtube page. So in a way, it's YOUR fault. I can speak to YOU directly because I know no one will ever read this. I'm out.

PS: I do read the marking criteria, and since I answered your question in it I think you owe me extra marks.

Monday, June 6, 2011

RARE BASED BLOCKBUSTERS FROM THE ZEF SIDE OF JAPAN

Blockbuster movies are always a sight to see. However just being a sight to see is not always a good thing. Many people criticize blockbusters because they always seem to be all about the Benjamins, and to an extent I think they are right. When we see a commercial for a big film like Avatar, Star Wars, or Jaws, it's all about the action and the scenes that are most appealing visually. However even with these types of movies, I still think that there is always a plot that can be considered something more than just flashy effects and loud noises.

Spider Man (2002) is a great example of a blockbuster movie that has a many aspects of it that can be viewed as excellent, even without the superhero, web slinging action. Peter Parker is just an average man, and becomes the savior of many. This in itself gives a lesson that anyone can be the hero (or anyone bitten by a radioactive spider). Peter must face many trials and tribulations we will all face in life: lying, relationship problems, friendship quarrels, and the choice of right or wrong. These are things that a movie like Spider Man can provide even while swinging from buildings and fighting arch foes.


Another great film that was a box office success as well as a heart warming tear jerker was E.T : The Extra Terrestrial (1982). E.T had tons of visually awe inspiring moments such as Elliot and E.T taking flight and E.T the alien himself, but there was always the presence of theme and a very deep plot in the movie. Elliot must become a man and learn to grow up. Elliot and E.T share their loneliness with each and learn that anyone can make a friend. If this movie doesn't make you think and weep on your knees, you are one insane person.
<- What would happen if Mr. T, and E.T had a baby?

Titanic (1997), although highly budgeted and extensively advertised, is nothing more than a love story you would find on any T.V drama or novel. Although love stories can be just as large a gimmick as explosions and special effects, they are much more hard to pull off. The heart warming and tragic tale of Jack Dawson and Rose Bukater shows us what true love really is. I don't think that a movie that's sole purpose is to make money could do something like that. I totally can't wait until 2012 when James Cameron releases it in 3D! (not!).

Blockbusters are what make it possible for the movie industry to continue. And really, where would we be without iconic movies like Star Wars, and Back to the Future? Nowhere, that's where. Even if once in a while we have to endure a The Hangover, or a Saw VII, I think it's worth it. Without these the good movies wouldn't be as good. Although those type of movies give blockbusters a bad rep, I think that most of them still withhold their own in the artistic and unique aspects of the film industry.